Skip to content

Settings and activity

4 results found

  1. 25 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Peter Crabtree supported this idea  · 
  2. 129 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Peter Crabtree supported this idea  · 
  3. 266 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Crabtree commented  · 

    I have no idea how something like this could happen, but if it could, oh man...

    Peter Crabtree supported this idea  · 
  4. 13 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Peter Crabtree commented  · 

    A first step here would be simply allowing independent LINQ statements from different servers, allowing users to do .AsEnumerable() and the joins themselves.

    Better, of course, would be allowing joins by transforming the LINQ, but that gets complicated quickly.

    Peter Crabtree supported this idea  ·