Skip to content

Settings and activity

10 results found

  1. 11 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Shlomi supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shlomi commented  · 

    This is actually a great idea..

    For example - my dev workstation is in another continents than our Production servers and DB. When running a big script with lot's of queries roundtrips - the latency is a real issue! (in SaveChanges - every update/insert is a full roundtrip!).

    Instead of packaging all the dll's and configurations and running the queries on a Production machine, this feature request would just solve it.

  2. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shlomi commented  · 

    Have you considered?

    Shlomi shared this idea  · 
  3. 73 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shlomi commented  · 

    One advantages of REPL would be when sometimes you want to change DB connection context without loosing the memory, i.e. query a DB then use that information to query a different one.

    This can be also achieved if we could use multiple contexts objects instead of 'this' (without the feature of adding additional DB's to the same context).

  4. 129 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shlomi commented  · 

    Hallur - nice idea :) tnx

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shlomi commented  · 

    Hi Bill,
    If you want I've created a small snippet for TransactionScope - 'tscope':
    (can used also as surround-with)

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
    <CodeSnippets xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/VisualStudio/2005/CodeSnippet">
    <CodeSnippet Format="1.0.0">
    <Header>
    <Title>TransactionScope</Title>
    <Shortcut>tscope</Shortcut>
    <Description></Description>
    <Author>Shlomi</Author>
    <SnippetTypes>
    <SnippetType>Expansion</SnippetType>
    <SnippetType>SurroundsWith</SnippetType>
    </SnippetTypes>
    </Header>
    <Snippet>
    <Code Language="csharp"><![CDATA[using (TransactionScope scope = new TransactionScope(TransactionScopeOption.Required,
    new TransactionOptions { IsolationLevel = System.Transactions.IsolationLevel.ReadUncommitted }))
    {
    $selected$ $end$
    }]]>
    </Code>
    </Snippet>
    </CodeSnippet>
    </CodeSnippets>

    Shlomi shared this idea  · 
  5. 21 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Shlomi shared this idea  · 
  6. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shlomi commented  · 

    After playing with Cache() - I have to say that it is quite dangerous in some cases. The fact that it is not parameters sensitive might be very misleading and give wrong results because of the cache.
    I know that I should know what I'm doing when using it, but sometimes you forget and get burned.

    For your consideration.

    Shlomi shared this idea  · 
  7. 52 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Shlomi shared this idea  · 
  8. 21 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shlomi commented  · 

    John - thanks!

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Shlomi commented  · 

    My vote here.
    an option to add a folder link to 'My Queries' could be useful for shared directories.

  9. 847 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
  10. 338 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)