Skip to content

Settings and activity

9 results found

  1. 1 vote
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Charles Burns shared this idea  · 
  2. 338 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Charles Burns commented  · 

    The linked forum post no longer exists. It seems like this should be closed.

  3. 843 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Charles Burns commented  · 

    Avalonia is now pretty stable and popular, though that would require reworking the entire UI in a new framework.

  4. 1,276 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Charles Burns commented  · 

    This would be a cool feature, and now that I think about it, basic features would likely not be terribly difficult to implement. Perhaps some very autocomplete could be added, such as auto-complete of column and table names for the most popular DBMS systems, but full-on autocompletion like an IDE does for C# would be too much for a small, lean project like LINQPad.

  5. 1,685 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Charles Burns commented  · 

    Isn't this what an IDE is for? Or VSCode? Or the command line?
    LINQPad is, to me, for quick code tests, quick queries, quick snippet tests.
    If the developer starts adding features like this, LINQPad will cease being LINQPad and will become an ersatz VSCode. Not a good direction.

    Charles Burns supported this idea  · 
  6. 266 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Charles Burns supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Charles Burns commented  · 

    ReSharper is amazing, and certainly not "for people who don't know how to write quality code on their own". It is also large, slow, complex, and its integration would require considerable effort from JetBrains, which is simply not going to happen at all. Ever.
    It makes much more sense to request specific code refactoring features, preferably ones which would be straightforward to implement.

  7. 198 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Charles Burns supported this idea  · 
  8. 4 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Charles Burns supported this idea  · 
  9. 734 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Charles Burns supported this idea  ·