Settings and activity

  1. 1 vote
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  LINQPad Feature Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    chojrak11 shared this idea  · 
  2. 4 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  LINQPad Feature Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    chojrak11 commented  · 

    I'd cast all my votes on this one <3

    An error occurred while saving the comment
    chojrak11 commented  · 

    Yes! It's not as rare as you would imagine that people use Linqpad to do some micro-optimizations or algorithm analysis.

    This request is not only about opcodes themselves, but it would make instruction size and arguments more apparent. Reading address offsets is more cumbersome than needed.

    chojrak11 supported this idea  · 
  3. 3 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  LINQPad Feature Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    chojrak11 shared this idea  · 
  4. 11 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  LINQPad Feature Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    chojrak11 commented  · 

    ALT-S has been fixed (thanks Joe), so I'm removing my votes. Thanks!

    chojrak11 shared this idea  · 
  5. 7 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  LINQPad Feature Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  6. 49 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  LINQPad Feature Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  7. 50 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  LINQPad Feature Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →

    Are you aware that you can call .Dump() on an expression? The output is not exactly the same as the Expression Tree Visualizer, but it conveys much of the same information. Is there anything missing from what you see that you’d like added? Or anything that you’d like changed?

  8. 23 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  LINQPad Feature Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →
  9. 22 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Sign in with: Facebook Google
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  LINQPad Feature Suggestions  ·  Flag idea as inappropriate…  ·  Admin →